rangerpretzel ([info]rangerpretzel) wrote,
@ 2006-05-29 14:30:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood:busy

Losing weight is Simple!
No seriously. Losing weight isn't that hard. Since December of 2005 I've lost a little over 20 pounds and the weight continues to come off at around 1 lbs/week. By the time Burning Man roles around, I should be another 10 to 15 pounds lighter.

People have asked me:
- How do you do it?
- How is it so easy?
- Why haven't you gained it back?
- How can I do it?

1) The first and foremost was deciding that being fit/healthy was more important than pretty much anything else. Naturally, food is one of those things that you need to survive, but can also become a crutch or a way to comfort yourself. So Step 1 was making it such that food was still enjoyable, but limiting its role to only sustinence, rather than a way to make myself feel good.

In other words, How badly do you want to be in shape? If you want it badly enough, then the resolve, determination, and will-power will push you through any tough spots.

2) The next part is knowing how much you need to eat on a daily basis to maintain your current weight. Most people don't know this. Nor how to obtain this. Fortunately, this has already been figured out:

Visit the What You Burn table. (First table is for Men. Second table is for Women.) Take your height and body size and you get a caloric range of what you should eat to in order to maintain your current weight. btw, the rest of that site is actually really good and I recommend reading it...

For example, Jane is a Woman who is 5'4" with a Medium frame. Jane would need to consume between 1574–1967 calories. Let's round up to 1600 to 2000 and split the difference. This puts Jane at a daily caloric requirement of ~1800 calories/day, just to maintain her current weight.

Fact: 1 pound of fat = ~3500 calories.

With this fact in mind, to lose 1 pound in 1 week, we need to divide 3500 calories over 7 days. This (conveniently) comes out to 500 calories.

In order for Jane to lose 1 pound/week, she needs to subtract 500 from her daily caloric requirement of 1800. This means that Jane needs to eat approx. 1300 calories per day. Essentially she creates a deficit in her caloric intake which requires that her body burn her stored body fat to make up the difference.

So what about exercise? Don't worry. I'm getting to that...

3) The third step is to know your weight, ie:
- Where your weight is
- Which direction it is going
- How fast in that direction it is going
- Where you've come from

There are many ways to do this, but the best way to do it is by using this highly-advanced secret weapon. It's actually a 2-part weapon.

- A good, accurate digital scale. ($30 - $40 ???)
- Weight chart that smooths out the highs and lows to get an accurate picture, like this one:



Click here to go to PhysicsDiet.com to get your own free account (no catches or funny business...)

In order to create this graph, I weighed myself every morning for 30 days straight. As you can see, the individual data points are all over the place and vary as much as 2 pounds from day to day! Naturally, I didn't lose 2 pounds over night, most of that is water weight. But the up and down roller coaster can be maddening.

Notice also the smooth trend line? Not so terrible, huh?
Notice also that it tells me the "true" amount that I lost each week.
The chart also shows me when I've fallen off the bandwagon by marking the area in red. (It helps keep ya honest...)

Now the truth is that you must weigh yourself and plug in your weight every day. Especially when your weight rises above the trendline into the "red zone". If you just give up when you start to gain weight or when you reach your target weight, then you've lost because you'll just gain it all back.

But if you keep plugging in your weight every day, then you can see where you are, where you are going, how fast, and how far you've come. Very motivating!

4) The last step is exercise. Our bodies are made for motion and when you exercise, you bring health and vitality back to your body. It also helps accelerate the weight loss, too.

When you exercise, you should permit yourself to go over your daily caloric limit a bit, but no more than say 200 or 300 calories. Just enough to replenish your body with carbs and protein after your hard workout.

Other tips for making it work:
- Drink lots of water. 8 cups a day, minimum.
- Cut back on the alcohol. It slows down your metabolism and has extra calories.
- Don't "eat out" or "order in" so much. It's nearly impossible to guess how many calories a dish has. Chances are you'll underestimate how many calories a dish truly has.
- Carry a small notebook around with you for the first month and record every calorie daily. Keep a running total as you eat across the course of the day. This way you can budget properly for the day and leave enough calories as the day progresses. After a while, you get a really good feeling for how many calories you're eating.

That's it! Helpful?




(12 comments) - (Post a new comment)

what about your metabolism's fear of famine?
[info]cthulhia
2006-05-29 10:06 pm UTC (link)
of making itself super-efficient so that, even at 500 less calories a day, your body will still have some left to store as fat?

this is why the simple equation of reducing input to output is really not so simple.

you may want to point out to the unaware that the exercise not only burns calories, but boosts metabolism. for many, that boost is enough to overcome the body going into famine conservation mode. For me, after years of steady gain despite regular exercise and prescription thyroid, I still had to resort to a low-carb diet to get going.

That said, now that I'm more aware of that sugar impedes the metabolism (by causing more insulin production which does all kinds of nasty things), I find myself able to manage my weight when I actually make the effort.

(I've lost maybe 10-15 since december, so, not as efficient at you. but, I'm hoping to reboot the low-carb thing by doing the strict phase again. I first did it, to satisfying results, the 2 weeks after memorial day in 2004. So, I want to see if I can go that strict again.)

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: what about your metabolism's fear of famine?
[info]rangerpretzel
2006-05-29 11:29 pm UTC (link)
fear of famine? Sure you jest.

Starvation mode usually only kicks in if you're below 1000 calories per day.

Sure, there are things that can make you lose weight faster.
- Exercise (which I did mention accelerates weight loss)
- Cutting back on high-glycemic index/load foods

Regarding the Low-carb thing. I found this entirely unsustainable over the long term, myself. To deny myself a whole category of energy (carbs) was just intoleratble. So I just eat whatever I want, keep my caloric intake to around 2000 calories, and exercise.

I will re-iterate that you do need to watch your caloric intake like a hawk, though. I've seen people fail at this. They claim they're cutting out 500 calories, but in each case they usually fail to account for those small things (25 cals here, 50 cals there...) that add up.

Anyway, I thought some people would be interested in the Hacker's Diet guide and the Physics Diet weight tracker.

A bunch of us have a running thread on a technical forum and everyone who follows the weight loss guide and who plugs in their weight daily seems to be losing at least 1 pound per week.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: what about your metabolism's fear of famine?
(Anonymous)
2006-05-31 01:53 am UTC (link)
The PhysicsDiet.com/Hacker's Diet system has pretty much freed me from needing to count calories. I can see from my monthly and weekly trends what kind of calorie deficit I'm running at, and can adjust my eating habits accordingly.

Calorie deficit gone from 700/day to 500/day? Try eating slightly smaller meals, reduce the fat in your cooking, or make some other small change.

Calorie deficit gone from 700/day to 900/day? Not bad - you can either enjoy the increased rate of weight loss or enjoy an extra treat every now and then.

http://www.time-to-get-fit.com

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: what about your metabolism's fear of famine?
(Anonymous)
2006-05-31 01:48 am UTC (link)
I hear a lot of people talk about this metabolism/fear of famine thing, but really most people I've heard it from are just using it as an excuse to not bother with dieting. If there's a good 'scientific' reason dieting isn't going to work, then you don't have to go to all the trouble of even starting, do you? :-)

In practice, a 500 calorie/day deficit is pretty easy to maintain over the longer term, and results in a healthy rate of weight loss of about a pound a week. It really is that simple.

I'm not denying that some people might experience a fear-of-famine effect, but don't even think about that until you've actually tried!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: what about your metabolism's fear of famine?
[info]cthulhia
2006-05-31 03:52 am UTC (link)
trust me, I did try.

but... even when I had the willpower to endure feeling hungry/unsatisfied all the time, I didn't lose weight.

If you feel hungry too often, not only are you likely to emotionally fail at any diet, but, it can trigger the famine reaction metabolic drop.

I chose a (modified) low carb diet after a year of casual research via my then-contract at New England Journal of Medicine. I lost 35 lbs in 6 months. (One of the most effective aspects of the low-carb diet is that removing sugars removes cravings and demoralizing hunger. I did end up eating less calories, and not noticing, after the first 3-4 days of angst, but, much better than endless months of angst.)

The ugly rumor that Tufts has been researching: your body effectively remembers its highest weight, and treats any kind of significantly loss as famine, and tries to get you back to that weight. Hence why so many people regain, and diets ultimately fail.

If it was, at all, really that simple, it would not be such an involved topic for so many.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]bluepapercup
2006-06-06 11:43 pm UTC (link)
I like this, a lot. In fact, I'm going to share your post with [info]freakydimension. He and I are both trying to lose about the same amount of weight (50 lbs) and so we're faced with quite a road ahead.

I like that this approach (like some of my other favorites, including but not limited to The No S Diet) says nothing about WHAT to eat, only that you SHOULD eat, and eat LESS.

There is a mental-emotional component to this as well, but that wasn't necessary to the spirit of your post. For me, the emotional aspect of being "Fat" and also the prospect of losing weight added to my already annoyingly fucked up relationship with food has keep me from being able to properly tackle the mechanics of weight loss. Now that I'm at a point in my life where I've made a lot of peace with food and done a lot of thinking/resolving in my own mind, I'm much more ready to deal with the calories in/calories out part.

I've acually lost somewhere between 10 and 13 pounds since getting to California. I've been here eighteen weeks, so that works out about right. With a few changes I suspect that could be greatly accelerated.

Thanks for the motivation! Burn on ;)

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2006-06-12 03:18 am UTC (link)
According to the FDA, an estimated 50 million Americans will go on diets this year, and perhaps 5% of them will keep that weight off in the long run. And yet you have the answer simple as pie. That's it! It's so easy! What do you make of the disparity? Is everyone other than you stupid, missing the obvious? Or are you a super-genius?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]rangerpretzel
2006-06-12 04:00 am UTC (link)
Won't show your face, eh? Hiding behind the "Anonymous Coward" option, huh? That's okay. I understand... ;)

I think I outlined it pretty well. Nope, not a super-genius, but I am pretty smart.

Here's the disparity, since you asked. But really, I'm just going to go over the 4 points that I outlined already... Ah well, a little clarity and re-inforcement never hurt anyone...

1) Make up your mind to lose weight.

Not just, "oh I wanna be thin" or "I'm going to lose weight", but really decide that you are going to achieve health and fitness for the long term. There are lots of words for it: resolve, determination, willpower, etc. Most people think they can "fix" their weight, but it really is about "managing" your weight and health over the long term.

That's the first disparity.


2) Knowing how much you need to eat to maintain your weight.

Most Americans just don't know how much they need to eat. It's a guessing game. Or they don't even want to be bothered with it. Some have fooled themselves into thinking that they need to eat much more than they should really be eating and they beleive this notion to be the truth.

Having a hard number and counting your calories for a month really gives you a good feel for how much is normal and how much most Americans typically overeat. The slow and steady weight loss helps reinforce this.

Not having information about how much you need to eat is disparity #2.


3) Knowing your weight.

People (in general) are afraid of the scale. These same people don't understand that weight fluctuates widely and wildly every day. Sometimes by as much as 5 pounds (or more.)

Plugging your daily weight into an exponential moving average takes these "noisy" data points and creates a true "signal" out of them. When armed with your "true" weight, where you've come from, and where your weight is headed, then you can make headway in the "losing weight" battle.

Most diets don't encourage the tracking of weight. People lose some or all of the weight that they want, but because our memories are so short, we forget and the weight creeps back on.

The lack of calorie target illustrated in point #2 and the lack of weight information in point #3 is the third disparity.

4) Exercise.

Do I really need to comment on this?

That's disparity #4.

So what about the people who say, but I do all of these things? In each case that I've observed, they *think* they are doing these things, but in fact, are not.

1) I see a lot of friends less than committed mentally, even though they think they are.

2) I see a lot of friends say that they are counting their calories, but in fact fail to count the small "incidentals" that occur across the course of the day. These little 25 calorie here, 50 calorie there slip-ups can quickly add up and sabotage efforts. Some people even forgot whole meals at times. And then when pointed out, they say sheepishly, "oh yeah..."

3) If the weight doesn't keep coming off or starts rising, instead of figuring out where they went wrong, they stop weighing themselves daily. They blame the failure on the diet, rather than themselves. How can you get a handle on your weight if you stop weighing yourself?

4) Exercise. Most people aren't willing to put in a minimum of 30 minutes of cardio. Or if they do, they frequently don't get their heart rate up enough for long enough. Many people give themselves permission after a workout to go "pig out", essentially undo-ing all the fat burning they just accomplished.


I maintain that most losing weight is easy.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2006-08-01 03:57 am UTC (link)
I won't argue that the basics of losing weight are simple: eat less and exercise. But honestly, your method as described is neither simple nor easy and for some of us, utterly maddening. Counting every calorie?? Ick ick ick. When I tried doing that, the stress actually caused me to gain, and I wasn't even overweight. For me, what works best is to just eat generally healthier and exercise more. But counting calories is way too OCD even for me.

The basics are simple but everyone needs to find their own way to get past their excuses.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]rangerpretzel
2006-08-01 11:51 am UTC (link)
to get past their excuses.

Heh, looks like you're making excuses in your reply to me... :)

No really... weightloss is simple and it is not hard. Want me to refine it further?

1) Eat 500 less calories than your body needs, every day.
2) Weigh yourself every morning (and plug that weight into your spreadsheet) so you can track your progress.

Pay attention to the trend line and not your daily weight. You'll have to put a little faith in that the trend line of an exponential moving average is not maddening. In fact, it smooths out the madness.

The whole "count every calorie" thing was just to keep yourself honest.

You gained weight by counting calories? Well, either:
A) you weren't counting every calorie, or
B) you weren't eating less than your body needed, or
C) you were temporarily retaining water weight, which ultimately passes in a few days.

Sounds like you were making excuses. OCD? Perhaps a little, but who says you are required to do it? I've only done it for 3 months of the 8 that I've done it... The rest of the time I've just generally gone by feel. But when I find that my weight starts to level off, I go back to counting calories for a week to see what I'm doing wrong. It's usually that I've added some random empty calorie snacks or things here and there.

Counting calories is not that hard. Takes a little self-discipline, but it's not hard.

I found that counting calories gave me a good feel for how much to eat. You can eat the healthiest stuff in the world, but if you're still eating more than your body needs, you won't lose weight.

Oh, btw: I'm now down 30 pounds since I started! A few other people who have done this with me are down 100 pounds or more. And they're keeping the weight off.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2006-08-03 12:16 am UTC (link)
Making excuses for what? I'm in fine shape. I eat well and exercise. But I don't count calories -- as noted above, it doesn't work for me and is nothing but an annoyance. It's great that it works for you, but I find it it obnoxious and condescending to claim something is somehow universally "easy" just because you can do it when you know full well it's something that many people have great difficult with.

I don't know you so I won't give examples, but I have no doubt there are a million things that are easy for other people but you can't do at all.

Now, I happen to agree with you in that I don't find it very difficult to be in shape, but I believe the key is to find a way that works for you.

That said, I do think it is truly wonderful that you've found your way and feel so great as a result. Congratulations, honest.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]rangerpretzel
2006-08-03 12:51 am UTC (link)
Well, yes, I guess if you want to pick an extreme example, I will concede that a mentally retarded person might have trouble counting. But the majority of the population can read labels and calories. And the majority of the population can count and even add numbers together. Not what I would define as "difficult" for anyone of reasonable intelligence...

As noted, I don't always count calories either. The last 10 pounds that I lost, I didn't count a single calorie. The reason why it is important to count calories at first (week, month, 2 months?) is to re-program the subconscious. In an overweight person, the subconscious no longer has a proper instinct to eating. By making the act of eating very conscious, you can reprogram your instinct for eating.

The reason I was so verbose in my original post is that I wouldn't want to be less than clear, but sometimes verbosity is seen as complicated or difficult. Fair enough. But as they say, "the devil is in the details." The details are just to steer you clear of the "gotchyas", "pitfalls", and other hazards. Ignore or gloss over the details and I can see why you wouldn't "get it".

I still maintain that the basic formula for weightloss is:

1) Make managing your weight a permanent priority (even when you arrive at your target weight.)
2) Eat a little less than your body needs (until you hit your target weight)
3) Weigh yourself every day so that you have a feedback loop (the moving average chart is just so you don't go insane with the ups and downs...)

End of story.

Ah well, find me obnoxious and condescending if you must. I guess I can't please all of the people all of the time. And what's up with the "Anonymous" posting still? Rather cowardly, don't you think? (My guess is that this is someone that I know, despite the claim to the contrary...)

Eh? :)


(Reply to this) (Parent)


(12 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…